If you plan to learn a new language

 I would advise you to learn conjunctions and adverbs as soon as possible. These parts of speech are not usually included in a newbeginner level, but i claim that conjunctions or adverbs are often used when you read a text. Probably every 7 th word is a conjunction or an adverb and there are not that many grammar complicated grammar rules with these parts of speech.  For example the adverb "Always" is just "Always", also in finnish "Aina" you do not conjugate "Aina", but there are several adverbs and conjunctions you conjugate in finnish. Or the word for Always in german is "immer" and "immer " is just "immer" or italian "sempre" is just "sempre" nice and easy and every time you read a text in italian and you find the word "sempre" then you know that this means "Always" in English. You do not have to conjugate this word "always" into hundreds of congations like you have to do with some verbs. So let`s begin with something useful and easy.

the word for "now" is in

finnish:  nytten, nyttemmin, nyt (is a dialect) I just Always have to correct finnish, puh

Swedish: nu

norwegian: nå

german: jetzt

italian: ora, adesso

Oh i love this, have a nice day.


Moikka

lingue, lingue

 I speak also fluent Swedish and if you speak and Swedish you are able to understand norwegian and danish as well, but danish sounds like someone is speaking with a potato in one`s throat. I only understand danish if i read it. I live in Norway and i read danish sometimes, so there you go. I try to read french sometimes also it is similar to italian, but there are still differences


italian: arriverderci

french: au revoir


moikka

Hi

 I would describe myself as brave, loyal, mostly in a good mood,  spontaneous, creative and i am as gifted as Claude Debussy. Well, if you have listened to my musical works, you can hear that i am spontaneous. I could compose something systematic like Chopin or Bach, but i prefer to write what falls into my mind, something more unpredictable like Schumann. The brilliant genius Chopin used mostly passages when he composed his etudes. Schumann used also passages when he composed, but not as much as Chopin. Schumann was not that structured like Chopin. My works remind you more of Schumann. But Beethoven was the greatest, i think Beethoven was inspired by Mozart.
And there are Three apples on my apple tree, it is a record.


 Moikka

italian finnish

 Hi, there are a few similar word in finnish and italian. I am not sure, but i suppose we have borrowed some word in finnish from latin or the italian language.

 In italian you say:

Questi sono pieni= These are full  (sing9 pieno= full   (plur) pieni= full

  

and this word "pieni" in finnish means "small"   pieni=small

pieni koira= small dog


 italian (sing) vuoto= empty


in finnish this word "vuoto" means "leakage"   (sing) vuoto= leakage


Moikka

ja enempi kielioppia ja aivojumppaa

 i just want to mention something about personal pronouns in finnish, which is totally different from other several european  languages, that is the third person singular in finnish. Hmmm


Swedish

Han= he
hon=she

German

er=he
sie= she

italian:

Lui=he

lei=she

English he and she

finnish the third person sing is hän, which is the word for he or she in finnish.

hän= he

hän= she


Thnx for Reading, moikka

About coffee

 Hi i am prepairing delicious vegan  food. It is summer here in Norway and the daisies outside my bedroom window make me glad. The roses in my garden are lovely

According to the finnish news:

Finnish ppl consume 12 kilograms coffe per year, italians consume 5,7 kg coffe per year and

spainiards consume 4,5 kg coffee.


My favorite dogbreed is papillon, oh i love papillons, but Donut is just awsome, she is brave and

loyal and clean and sweet. Donut welcomes me when i come home and she sleeps beside me on the

sofa, Donut is happy and she keeps me good company. Felines are wise i think

Moikka

grammar, grammar

 Hi, now i want to write about verbs again, about the future tense.

You build the future tense in English in two different ways, like you say:

I will come tomorrow.... or

I am going to come tomorrow....

Well in Swedish the future tense is equal with the present tense, in Swedish you say:

 Han kommer (komma)= he comes

Jag kommer (komma) imorgon= i come tomorrow

or

 Jag ska (skola)  komma imorgon= i will come tomorrow (i am going to come tomorrow)


 The norwegian future tense is similar with the Swedish

German:

Ich komme (kommen) morgen = i come tomorrow      oder......

Ich werde (werden) morgen kommen= i will come tomorrow ( iam going to come tomorrow)

Finnish: In my mother language you say

Tulen (tulla) huomenna= I come tomorrow

or

Aion(aikoa) tulla huomenna= i am going to come tomorrow or i will come tomorrow





But in finnish we conjugate the word huomenna or tomorrow in many different ways as well as the

verbs "tulla" and "aikoa" into many, many conjugations with potential verb tenses and so on.

I Think the word ja= and is almost the only word you do not conjugate or where you can`t add a

simple or a double particle into the end of the word.

You do not conjugate the word mutta=but in finnish but with this word you can add

double particles to the end of the word , like "mutta ko-han", which makes "mutta kohan" this is but

,which i Think would not be necessary.  But this is finnish. The particle is also useful, for example:

on (olla-to be) = is but  on+ko=>onko?  = is? In finnish you can make a question by using particles,

but to use double particles is not necessary. I use double particles when i speak finnish.



These are ways how you build the future tense in these language above, in these language you do not

conjugate the main verb into a future tense. But italians and i suppose other latin languages do the

same  wow, wow, wow.....

Io verró (venire) domani=i will come tomorrow

 I may call myself a grammardigger, perché no?



Moikka